Algae BioFuel Web Site
Sandy Reifler | Houston TX | american allergy supply | americanallergy@yahoo.com
![]() TBK BioDiesel Co-Inventor Janos THESZ HUNGARY | thesz@t-online.hu | |
Traditional BioDiesel VS TBK
BioDiesel
TBK BioDiesel Process Technical Specs Web Page
|
*
| USE OF FUELS OR FUEL ADDITIVES BASED ON
TRIGLYCERIDES OF MODIFIED STRUCTURE AND PROCESS FOR THEIR PREPARATION Abstract of HUNGARY Patent WO2008096187 The invention is directed to the use of triglycerides of modified structure, mostly known per se, as fuels, combustibles, or fuel and/or combustible additives, and to the fuels comprising them. In the description and in the claims the expression "fuel" means liquid motor propulsion materials and/or liquid combustibles. In addition, the invention is directed to new procedures for the simple, economical and environment protecting preparation of the triglycerides of modified structure and/or the mixtures comprising them, and at the same time the glycerol produced in the known procedures in large amounts can be utilized. Publication number: WO2008096187 Publication date: 2008-08-14 Inventor: THESZ JANOS (HU); BOROS BELA ISTVAN (HU); KIRALY ZOLTAN (HU) Applicant: THESZ JANOS (HU); BOROS BELA ISTVAN (HU); KIRALY ZOLTAN (HU) Classification: - international: C10L1/02; C10L1/18; C10L10/14; C10L1/00; C10L1/10; C10L10/14; - European: Application number: WO2008HU00013 20080205 Priority number(s): HU20070000128 20070206; HU20070000187 20070301; HU20070000281 20070416 |
*
TBK BioDiesel Power Point Presentation 880KB
*
![]() |
| Slide 1 illustrates very vividly the difference between traditional BioDiesel and TBK-BioDiesel: in my right hand I am holding the crude reaction product of a laboratory BioDiesel batch: the lower glycerol phase is lost for fuel purposes, the upper BioDiesel phase requires washings, stripping of methanol surplus, etc. In my left hand I am holding the TBK-BioDiesel product after separation of catalyst and stripping of surplus transesterifying reagent, manufactured from the SAME amount of starting oil, so that everyone can see that we get 10-15% more fuel out of the precious starting triglyceride oil! |
*
![]() |
| Slide 2 illustrates my calculations (some most insignificant items, such as neutralizing acids -- costing less than 1 €/t fuel produced, etc. -- have been omitted in both cases). One can see that in terms of production costs we are approximately. 8% cheaper, but one should also keep in mind that owing to incorporation of the transesterifying agent into TBK-BioDiesel, in each and every case we get a 10-15% increase in fuel mass from the same quantity of oil feedstock (which is "scarce") as compared to BioDiesel processes, so the profit content of this extra mass is added to the "usual" profit content of the fuel, thus yielding 10-15% EXTRA profits to the manufacturer. So in terms of profit we are ALWAYS 10-15% above traditional BioDiesel producers, even if production costs/selling prices were the same for both fuels. Even if you deduct the "hypothetical" selling price of the 128 kg of crude glycerol/t BioDiesel produced in the Lurgi process, we are still € 43/t product more economical. Please note here that additional costs of sewage and glycerol treatment/storage etc. of the Lurgi process have not been included. |
*
![]() |
| Slide 3 depicts viability of TBK-BioDiesel in terms of profits (which, after all, is the main interest of any one producer). With the above indicated feedstock/product price ratio and adding the "extra" profit to "normal" profit in the case of TBK-BioDiesel we attain almost 21% profits, whereas BioDiesel producers can show up 10% profits, or 12% if we take into account indicated crude glycerol selling prices. An additional cost effective "knack" of our process is the way we make use of oil residues of pressed cakes (usually with still 7-9% oil content): we can extract them with ethyl acetate itself (as it is miscible with oils, contrary to methanol/ethanol) and after addition of catalyst to this mixture our reaction is started. (So we can omit the not so cheap "hexane-extraction" step, improving on economics as against traditional BioDiesel processes. This has not been taken into account in our calculations either.) |
*
|
Rape Seed Oil VS TBK BioDiesel from Rape Seed Oil Chemical Analysis |
![]() |
*

*
Gentlemen, This is (Mr) Janos THESZ from Budapest, Hungary, co-inventor of "TBK-Biodiesel", a novel, really 100% "renewable" fuel ("TBK" has been coined from the initials of the three inventors: Thesz, Janos - Boros, Bela - Kiraly, Zoltan). To rouse your interest, please let me briefly touch upon the subject so that you can decide for yourselves whether it could be rewarding for you to collaborate with us on the introduction of this novel combustible. Traditional BioDiesel Process
As we all (should) know, traditional BioDiesel (BD, "FAME") is NOT a totally green fuel on account of its "methanolic" part, as methanol is fossil-derived (produced via oxidation of methane). Nor is the so-called second generation biodiesel (according to e.g. the Finnish "NExBTL" process) a really renewable fuel, as the hydrogen of the process is manufactured industrially through the oxidation of propane/butane, again fossils, whose very replacement should be the sole concern of a really green economy. TBK BioDiesel Process
or
What we do is a partial transesterification ("interesterification")
of naturally occurring triglycerides with alkyl (ethyl) esters of
short-chain fatty acids (acetic), whereby we get a mixture of modified
triglycerides with reduced molecular masses (that is, with reduced
viscosities) and the alkyl esters of displaced fatty acids: We get an extra 10% mass of fuel out of a given amount of feedstock after the exchange of each third of the original (long) chains (that is, we require 10 or so % less arable land to produce a given amount of fuel than in the case of traditional BD). The internal oxygen content of our fuel is about 30% higher than that of present biodiesel, affording better combustion properties, better emission profile, less soot, etc. Moreover, in every case our product has a lower iodine-number than the corresponding biodiesel (owing to "dilution" of double-bonds), yielding greater resistance to oxidative degradations. We have improved cold-properties (on account of the presence of a reduced molecular mass triglyceride), our volumetric energy density is 4-5% higher than that of present biodiesel, and so on. Our production costs are lower, we can utilize glycerol-wastes of traditional BD processes as feedstock, we can work in traditional BioDiesel plants, etc. So our stuff has half a dozen or so such merits,
which considered even individually, should call for the immediate
replacement of traditional "Biodiesel". And to top it all,
our transesterifying agent
ethyl acetate is a 100% green reagent -- manufactured for example
through dehydrogenation of fermentation ethanol. |
*
| Folks! See our PCT/HU 2008/000013 patent
application. We transesterify (or rather: interesterify) triglycerides with alkyl-esters of short-chain fatty acids (preferably with 100% bio-derived ethyl-acetate from ethanol), BUT only partially, whereby we get a mixture of modified triglycerides (with 50-70% newly introduced short chains), with reduced molecular masses, that is, with greatly reduced viscosities, and alkyl (ethyl) esters of displaced long chain fatty acids (that is, traditional biodiesel). There is no glycerol formation, but each and every atom of the biomass triglyceride is turned into fuel, yielding 15-20% more combustible out of a given amount of feedstock! (In other words: you need 15-20% LESS arable land to produce a given volume of biofuel. Most important issue these days.). No washings, no sewage, but 30% greater internal oxygen content, better emission profile, less soot, greater torque, lowered iodine number, better cold-properties, etc. And all this with lower production costs. To date ours is the ONLY really 100% renewable petrodiesel substitute (as the methanolic part of BD comes from methane, that is, a fossil). Well? Posted by: Janos THESZ | thesz@t-online.hu | |
*
|
Breaking news! 2/1/2009 Now, contrary to the (temporary) failure of geneticists, that is exactly what we have attained via a chemical "pathway", protecting the ensuing fuel in our patent application. (If we have two acetyl groups besides the one retained original long chain, viscosity is further lowered, so No. 2 diesel can be directly replaced by this modified triglyceride.) Also, please note that in the above cited paper researchers indicate a strong correlation between iodine number and NOx emissions of a plant-oil based fuel. Owing to iodine-number reduction in TBK-BD fuel, we have every reason to predict that our stuff will have much reduced values in this respect as well, causing our fuel to surpass all petro-diesel emission parameters (contrary to conventional BD, whose NOx emission is inferior to petro-diesel).
|
*
02/01/2009